The Hidden Ethical Dangers of AI in Nigeria
Artificial Intelligence is reshaping Nigeria’s daily
life—often invisibly. From leaked NIN/BVN data to abusive loan apps, deepfakes
in politics, AI-driven exam malpractice, and voice-cloned Afrobeats, the risks
are real and growing. Unless we design ethics grounded in Nigerian realities,
these technologies could harm more than they help.
AI is already affecting Nigerians in ways we cannot ignore.
In 2024, websites openly sold NIN and BVN data for ₦100, exposing millions.
Loan apps automated harassment by scraping borrowers’ contacts. During the 2023
elections, deepfake audio and video targeted candidates and spread on WhatsApp.
JAMB recently uncovered thousands of AI-enabled impersonation attempts, while
WAEC withheld over 215,000 results due to digital malpractice. Even our
creative industries face threats: Nollywood voices and Afrobeats sounds are
being cloned without consent.
Meanwhile, surveillance rollouts risk misidentifying
darker-skinned Nigerians, and imported AI tools still fail at Pidgin, Nigerian
English, and local languages. These dangers are not hypothetical—they are
ongoing. And copying Western “AI ethics” won’t save us. Nigeria’s reality is
different: centralized IDs, an informal economy, youth unemployment, and
fragile enforcement.
Yes, we have a National Data Protection Act, FCCPC
crackdowns, and a draft AI strategy. But gaps remain between paper policy and
lived harm. To protect dignity, elections, exams, and livelihoods, we need
Nigerian rules: strict data audits, deepfake takedown protocols, creative
rights updates, language benchmarks, and radical regulatory transparency.
Nigeria must act now. AI’s ethical dangers are not
future threats—they are present realities. Citizens, regulators, and innovators
must build an ethics framework rooted in our context: dignity (Ọmọlúàbí),
fairness in exams, integrity in politics, and protection for culture. Without
urgent Nigerian-specific guardrails, the promise of AI will become a peril.

Comments
Post a Comment